data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/390c2/390c2c5b1ce8fc9e68333344786f48bde0bf531a" alt="Swinsian forums"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a73f/0a73f3650240dabf663b2388362bda0a3da531fa" alt="swinsian forums swinsian forums"
A tough enamel like substance? I mean orcas tat fed on relatively small sharks get their teeth worn down over time, get a shark easily over 100-200 times plus the weight? Their teeth are going to be scraping down the skin with extreme difficulty trying to get through. It is claimed that shark skin is even bullet resistant by some people. Probably even thicker than a whale shark considering this is a female Megalodon and it needs to protect itself from male Megalodon bites and is a larger and longer shark overall I think it would be safe to say it would have 25cm skin compared to 20cm skin of a whale shark. Not only that shark skin is not soft jellyfish as one moronic member (leopardlover) might claim but is quite tough and actually pretty good at protecting the shark. Body length is correlated to increase in burst speed in sharks which is seen in Ferron 2017. Ferron 2017 estimated an 18 meter Megalodon had a burst speed of 37kmh (which scaling up from a scientifically recorded 4.877m, 1.6 tonnes great white aka Joan of Shark is a 80 tonnes shark). However I argue that the shark has the advantage of lurking beneath the pod and indefinitely diving deep. The Orcas can go for its gills and fins then they can eat all the liver they want. If Orcas can kill a Blue Whale in a pod then surely they can take down a much smaller Megalodon. The Orcas will probably be too fast and manueverable for the giant shark to chase. Stops at Round 4 or 5 maybe even 6 if it's lucky. This proves how biased Megalodon researchers are. You know what all the statements above have in common? Megalodon researchers came up with the above figures (just switch it from can't to was able) and are certified scientists/researchers Megalodon had decently tough skin like many modern sharks. Megalodon bite marks on sperm whale vertebrae is only one account.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0823/e08230db32209e8cf4f7782493023934a81b35a0" alt="swinsian forums swinsian forums"
Yes grawlix! Those dumb fishies should always lose! So overrated, this is payback.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59c1f/59c1f9ef9a7b318a03177ab8ebd3aa82dce1faf8" alt="swinsian forums swinsian forums"/mm_WMAtoMP3_step0-56a67e863df78cf7728eac80.jpg)
The shark will 100% lose every round because sharks can't kill anything noteworthy other than sardines and orcas are the superior animal even more so than ursids. A 60 tonne Pliosaur or a 60 tonne Livyatan? 103 tonnes shark doesn't have a chance, the Megalodon is a fish eating sack of fat with no predatory capabilities whatsoever. Also shark skin has no protection whatsoever and is soft jellyfish skin, orca teeth should slice through it like butter and spill out its entire organs into the sea. That being said 1 single bull orca could instantly take out a 200 tonnes blue whale from Nat Geo video. No reports of orca killing blue whales over 30 tonnes and 18m exist.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/390c2/390c2c5b1ce8fc9e68333344786f48bde0bf531a" alt="Swinsian forums"